Letters to the Editor: Response

Research-agenda Bias: letters to the editor

Author's Response Letters to the Editor

Sir—Our aim was to start a debate and to encourage an appropriate body to act. Gallacher’s letter is therefore most appreciated. The starting point is that much good work in developing questionnaires is wasted. Too often, mistakes are repeated and we lack agreed standards for validating questionnaires. Existing questionnaires are not always readily available and the protocol for their use is no...

Response to the letter to editor

No Abstract is available

Letters Letter to the Editor

The good name of TEX One of the many wonderful things about TEX is that its behaviour is essentially the same, no matter where it runs. TEX is a fixed point, identical on all machines. The same goes for METAFONT and the Computer Modern fonts. The author of TEX, Donald Knuth, has made it perfectly clear that he does not object to anyone revising TEX(or METAFONT) just as long as the resulting pro...

Letters Letters n Editor:

“Fronti Nulla Fides”: No reliance can be placed on appearance. In a letter to the editor (AI Mugazine, Winter 1989), Benjamin Kuipers criticizes various points made in an earlier paper of ours (Akman and ten Hagen 1989). First, a side (nonetheless important) remark: Although Kuipers asserts that he distributes QSIM to interested researchers, our experience has been otherwise. Akman has tried tw...